 |
|
| View previous topic | View next topic |
Hecateh Foundation Stone

Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:39 pm Post subject: Fairness and equality |
|
|
Following a thread about helping children in another part of the forum thought it was a good topic for ethical debate.
Most (many/some/few) people try to treat their children 'fairly' but to what extent do they succeed especially in the view of their children.
What exactly is fair - bearing in mind life isn't fair and people are 'favoured' by life in various different ways?
Is it ever right to do something for one child (or grandchild) that you would not be able to do for another? And if so, under what circumstances?
Post your thoughts and experiences here from botht he receiving, giving and observational point of view.
_________________ “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.”
- Ziggy
Made my 1000 miles walking in 8 months rather than the year of my target. Woo Hoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hecateh Foundation Stone

Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To start the ball rolling, an observation
One of my friends has two children both girls. Mum brought them up on her own, the father leaving when the younger of the two was about 2 I think.
The elder child is considered to be like her mum and is definitely favourite. The younger one is labelled - just like your dad.
However, the favoured child had so many expectations placed on her whilst the younger one was excused any behaviour. I know elder children often have to 'break the ground' for those that follow in terms of parental experience so that does explain/excuse to some extent but in the end both kids lost out from this.
They are both adult now and reasonably OK, though they each believe the other was spoilt. The older had to move away to get away from the apron strings - and constant interference from her mother.
The younger is spoilt, expects everyone to put up with her demanding and thoughtless behaviour but also has very low self esteem and is still in conflict with herself as she is still looking for approval from her mum but still behaves in the way her mum 'expects' her to- which is badly.
I know this person believes she loves her children equally and has always been fair to them. _________________ “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.”
- Ziggy
Made my 1000 miles walking in 8 months rather than the year of my target. Woo Hoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davbro Pioneer

Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 446 Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We have 9 direct grandchildren, (from 5 children), ranging from age 3 to 22. The 22 year old was born to daughter at age 16 and so was basically brought up by my OH and myself for 18 years.
This included taking him on some holidays and subbing him for various events, in effect he was treated as a son and for his first few years he called me Dad.
We have never taken any of the others on holiday or anything like that but we always give same for Birthdays and Xmas.
All our children accepted this and never complain that we have done more for Daniel than any of the others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nannyp Pioneer

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 2916 Location: Vienne, France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm replying to this before really thinking it through, so may come back with more.
I always tried to treat Jo and Phil equally, and in my eyes I feel I achieved that. In some respects, this worked against Jo, the oldest, as sometimes they were both treated the same, when perhaps she should have been treated differently due to her age. For quite a while, they shared the same bed time, (20 months between them) until I realised this was unfair.
Interestingly, they do not see themselves as having been treated equally. Each one has stories where the other was more favoured.
I know I love them both equally and want to give them both equal amounts of love, support and sometimes, when I can money.
I'm not sure it is right to do something for one, you can not meet for the other......I know that this is very likely to cause more problems with regard to sibling rivalry. Having said that, I wouldn't not give some financial support to say Jo, if I felt I couldn't for Phil...and in the scheme of things, each of them have needed some sort of financial support, but at different times, so maybe it evens out.
I'm not sure I have answered the question, and as I said, I might comeback to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dragonfly Pioneer

Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 1507 Location: Wales
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Got just one child... i dont qualify to answer :( |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dingsy Site Admin

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2106 Location: Devon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like Kathy, I'm sure I'll add to this, but in the meantime-
Before we even had children, Brian and I resolved that if we were to start a family, we would treat our children very differently to the way we had been treated. Although we were/are very loved, we were both very conscious of our younger siblings being the favoured party. Too numerous examples to mention, in early life, but as we became adults a trend was defintely emerging.
When Brian started working, his parents were happy to take half his earnings in "rent", wheras his siter("S"), contributed nothing from her salary, and indeed was supplemented with a bus pass and packed lunch everyday!
Throughout our married life, this trend has continued. Brian and I are very proud that we have made our own way in life, but it infuriates us to see S and co being assisted whenever the occasion arose. At no stage, have we ever been asked-"can we help you?". Admittedly we would have declined, but the offer would have been nice!
This attitude is apparent even in presents-several years ago, S received a classic burberry trench coat for Xmas, probably retailing for in excess of £500, whilst Brian received a pair of socks.
Sadly it also carried over to the grandchildren, which we find inexplicable, and hurts even more than any slight to us directly over the years. If nothing else-at least presents should be equal?
I accept that our situations are very different. S and family are unambitious, don't have much(why bother, when you have a never ending supply of bounty not far away?). From the outset, they chose the smallest cheapest house they could find:Brian and I pushed ourselves to our limit. Brain has done extremely well in life-he's very clever, extremely conscientious, and there was little doubt he would excel in whatever field he chose-and he has, the fruits of which enable us to have a very comfortable lifestyle. S's husband has been in the same (lowly paid job) for about 30 years. Each to their own-and all credit to them for what they have achieved under difficult situations.
But, we can't accept that our attitude/abilities/financial situation should mean that we're treated differently. Sadly, this continual attitude has caused huge problems. Brian has no contact whatsover with his sister and family-and I'm not sure they'll ever be reconciled. She feels that she's entitled to all the help she gets,we feel she's abusing her parent's (now mother, as father is dead)goodwill.
The whole gamut of emotion goes deeper than financial considerations, and the emotional hurt has been extensive. I think Brian will always resent this, and although we try not to get upset/angry it is difficult. We know things will never change, but we keep hoping...
So, as I said, I'm obsessive about keeping our two as equal as we can. They know and understand why-as they too have seen how their cousins have beeen prioritised throughout life. They are far more mature about it than we are, though, and cope much better! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hecateh Foundation Stone

Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your story reminded me of this one Elaine
(Your husband was the lucky one as he has achieved his potential - maybe it was the 'spoiling' that prevented his siter from doing so.
The Old Man and the Butterfly
Once upon a time in a land far far away. There was a wonderful old man who loved everything. Animals, spiders, insects ...
One day while walking through the woods the nice old man found a cocoon.
Feeling lonely he decided to take the cocoon home to watch its beautiful transformation from a funny little cocoon to a beautiful butterfly.
He gently placed the cocoon on his kitchen table, and watched over it for days
Suddenly on the seventh day the cocoon started to move. It moved frantically! The old man felt sorry for the little butterfly inside the cocoon. He watched it struggle and struggle and struggle!
Finally the old man feeling so sorry for the cocooned butterfly rushed to its aide with a surgical scalpel and gently slit the cocoon so the butterfly could emerge.
Just one slice was all it took, and the butterfly broke free from its cocoon only to wilt over in a completely motionless state.
The old man did not know what to think. Had he accidentally killed the little butterfly? No, its still moving a little bit.! Maybe its sick!
Who the heck would know? He was dumbfounded, and quite perplexed! What should I do, he said. Well he felt so sorry for the little creature that he decided the best thing he could do for the butterfly was to place it gently back into its cocoon.
He did so, and placed a drop of honey on it to seal the cocoon, leaving the butterfly to nestle in its natural state.
Well the next day he noticed that the cocoon was moving again. Wow, he said! It moved and moved and struggled and struggled. Finally the butterfly broke free from its cocoon and stretched its wings out far and wide. Big time yawn! Its beautiful wings were filled with wonderful colors! It looked around and took off! It was flying! Its so beautiful! The old man was jumping with joy! Wow!
Go Baby, Go! And that wonderful butterfly did that just that, it flew and flew till it was almost out of the old mans sight. What a joy, he exclaimed!
But then he started to think. What did I do wrong by trying to help that beautiful little butterfly out at first?
The old man went into town. Found the library, and read every book he could on butterflies and cocoons.
Finally the answer appeared. The butterfly has to struggle and struggle while inside the cocoon. That's how it gets its strength. That's just what they are designed to overcome in order to be strong and beautiful.
Well needless to say the old man was shocked, saddened, and somewhat relieved.
Now he knows the reason why they do what they do. It was only his perception that made it appear that the butterfly was having a hard time. Well from then on the old man knew that loving something sometimes means to pray for it and cheer it on!
He realized that God was wonderful, and that sometimes appearances aren't what they seem to be. That we all are beautiful butterflies, even though we have our apparent struggles in life... _________________ “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.”
- Ziggy
Made my 1000 miles walking in 8 months rather than the year of my target. Woo Hoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hecateh Foundation Stone

Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sarah, of course you can have an opinion. It's a good thing to think about whilst there is only one (and even if it stays that way).
You can have thoughts about any situation - we are not only talking about personal experience here - it's good to discuss things and to disagree at times even so long as we respect others points of view. Experience shapes our view but discussions can help shape our experience and perspectives. _________________ “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.”
- Ziggy
Made my 1000 miles walking in 8 months rather than the year of my target. Woo Hoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dingsy Site Admin

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2106 Location: Devon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What a lovely tale Hec-thanks for sharing!
We'll never know what S could have achieved-in many ways, I feel sorry for her. However, her attitude is and was appalling. She decided at 13 not to work at school, as a teacher (wrongly) told her off for asking a question about something she didn't understand. But, she's lazy too-it's hard at times to think these two kids had the same parents.Brian feels that realising his potential, as he has undoubtedly done, has come about through ******hard work.So often we have heard, "but you're the lucky ones..",etc. Sadly, too, we have always been discouraged from saying too much about our achievements("if S knew she'd be upset").
A complex, difficult situation all round, which has caused a huge rift in this family, which I suspect will never be healed, as both Brian and S dislike each other intensely now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nannyp Pioneer

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 2916 Location: Vienne, France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your's and brian's experience sounds awful Elaine, and he has every reason to feel so unhappy with what has happened. It really is a very extreme example of the inequality often played out in families.
I have a question and will explain my reason later.
How was Brian born? Was he a normal, vaginal delivery?
And "S" normal vaginal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dingsy Site Admin

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2106 Location: Devon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Both normal deliveries Kathy (this is intriguing!).Brian was slightly complicated though-the cord was around his neck, so he needed to be resuscitated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nannyp Pioneer

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 2916 Location: Vienne, France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to intrigue you then disappear.
I wondered, as I have understood that a Caesarean birth can mean a child becomes more passive and less likely to struggle to attain.
Obviously, in this case, this isn't part of the problem.
I wonder whether Brian's parents have issues around male's (ie bad experiences with brothers/fathers) and there is then negative transference on male children? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dingsy Site Admin

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2106 Location: Devon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Afraid not, Kathy!
His Dad(a fantastic, charming man) had 3 brothers. Parents divorced-his mother kept the 3 younger, sending the eldest (Brian's Dad) to live with his father.
His Mum had a sister, 3 brothers. She was very close to her Dad, helping him in the garden, etc., as her mother found it difficult coping with a large family.
Not sure how or why things developed as they did-but we've done our utmost not to make similar mistakes, so to that extent, something positive has come out of it.With hindsight, we should have made clear how much this attitude was hurting us- over the years there were(and still are) arguments around it, with the parents (his Dad is now dead), in denial.Or, at the very least, attempting to justify the inequalities. We've just had to accept it,and not allow the resentment to dominate our lives.
Having said that-one final example, of the hoops we have had to go through. Due to S's delicate sensiblities, when Brian became the youngest ever director in his company's history, we knew not to phone and share our very exciting news until late in the evening-in case you-know-who was there, and got upset. Crazy.I really think they over-compensated to S and her family-to put it very bluntly, Brian got all the brains, and S all the brawn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hecateh Foundation Stone

Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kath - looks like we were sort of thinking on the same lines but at a different juncture.
My post was saying that Brian's upbringing made him stronger - yours seeing a possible reason for the passivity of 'S'.
I'm one of 7 children - will post more another time BUT Mum says she treats us al the same - which (besides being totally untrue) is, to me, not the same as equal. With equal there has to be an element of 'to each what they need' - balanced over time certainly but we do all have different needs and also personalities and that will affect how we are treated. It is much harder to be fair than to just divide time or money up exactly the same,I feel BUT that does not mean anyone should be left out, neglected or forgotten. Very hard. As has been said - children will see inequalities as they will remeber the time they were disappointed more than the time they received. _________________ “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.”
- Ziggy
Made my 1000 miles walking in 8 months rather than the year of my target. Woo Hoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dingsy Site Admin

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2106 Location: Devon
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that it's hard-but it's not impossible. If one child/person in any relationship is always the priority, then surely this is unfair?
I agree too, with the impact the upbringing may have had-but if this was equal, as the parents claim, then the vast differences in attitude become even more astounding.Perhaps this is actually where parents need to assess and handle the situation and their offspring differently. From an early age the personality traits were apparent. With hindsight, S possibly would have achieved more if she had been challenged, instead of wrapped in cotton wool. We'll never know! Perhaps Brian would be more sympathetic to other's difficulties, if his emotional upsets had been listened to, and acted upon. (He's a vey compassionate person in terms of helping in a practical fashion,and will do anything for anyone, but in terms of emotional support,he struggles and is very ill at ease, unless it's for myself and the kids)
I'm not too sure that I fully agree with your last point, though Hec. I think because we have been passed over as a matter of course, it's the times when we have been helped, that are prominent in our minds. Simply because there are so few of the latter, and so many of the former!
Very interesting debate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|